Links Products What is Hydroponics?

Gardening Facts

 
Product  Categories 
 
Grow Light Packages
 
Grow Lights Access.
 
Hydroponics Systems
 
Hydroponics Nutrients
   
Growth Enhancers
   
Test Equipment
   
Climate-Odor Control
   
Seedling/Cutting Supply
   
Soil and Soil Products
   
Growing Accessories
   
Growing Medium
   
Pest & Disease Control
   
Books & Videos
   
Drip Irrigation
   
Grow Light Info
   
Hydroponics Glossary
 
 
 
 
 

Hydroponics Gardening Facts

The History of Hydroponics
As seen in Growing Edge Magazine
Hydroponics basically means working water ("hydro" means "water" and "ponos" means "labor"). Many different civilizations have utilized hydroponic growing techniques throughout history. As noted in Hydroponic Food Production (Fifth Edition, Woodbridge Press, 1997, page 23) by Howard M. Resh: "The hanging gardens of Babylon, the floating gardens of the Aztecs of Mexico and those of the Chinese are examples of 'Hydroponic' culture. Egyptian hieroglyphic records dating back several hundred years B.C. describe the growing of plants in water."
Hydroponics is hardly a new method of growing plants. However, giant strides have been made over the years in this innovative area of agriculture. Throughout the last century, scientists and horticulturists experimented with different methods of hydroponics. One of the potential applications of hydroponics that drove research was for
growing fresh produce in nonarable areas of the world. It is a simple fact that some people cannot grow in the soil in their area (if there is even any soil at all). This application of hydroponics was tested during World War II. Troops stationed on nonarable islands in the
Pacific were supplied with fresh produce grown in locally established hydroponic systems. Later in the century, hydroponics was integrated into the space program. As NASA considered
the practicalities of locating a society on another plant or the Earth's moon, hydroponics easily fit into their sustainability plans. This research is ongoing. But by the 1970s, it wasn't just scientists and analysts who were involved in hydroponics. Traditional farmers and eager hobbyists began to be attracted to the virtues of hydroponic growing. A few of the positive aspects of hydroponics include:
• The ability to produce higher yields than traditional, soil-based agriculture
• Allowing food to be grown and consumed in areas of the world that cannot support crops in the soil
• Eliminating the need for massive pesticide use (considering most pests live in the soil), effectively making our air, water, soil, and food cleaner
Commercial growers are flocking to hydroponics like never before. The ideals surrounding these growing techniques touch on subjects that most people care about, such as helping end world hunger and making the world cleaner. In addition to the extensive research that is going
on, everyday people from all over the world have been building (or purchasing) their own systems to grow great-tasting, fresh food for their family and friends. Educators are realizing the amazing applications that hydroponics can have in the classroom. And ambitious individuals are striving to make their dreams come true by making their living in their
backyard greenhouse, selling their produce to local markets and restaurants. And now that so many people from so many different walks of life are involved in hydroponics and its associated disciplines (such as aeroponics and aquaponics), progress is coming faster than ever before.

Aero-Hydroponics
The Method of the Future
by Lawrence L. Brooke
A Brief History

The aero-hydroponic method was developed in Israel in the early 1980's. Dr. Hillel Soffer,
senior researcher at the Volcani Institute at Ein Gedi developed the aero-hydroponic method to overcome the challenges presented by the hot, arid conditions at Ein Gedi. The discoveries that followed the development of aero-hydroponics offer great benefits to all hydroponic
growers.
During a two-year period from 1986 to 1988, Dr. Soffer performed extensive research using the aero-hydroponic method at the University of California at Davis, where he had received his
Ph.D. in the early 1970s. The specific area of research was in quantifying the effect of various
 levels of dissolved oxygen on root growth, especially in the propagation of plants from cuttings. The findings of his research were published in the Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, and HortScience. Both studies were co-authored with David Burger at
UCD. In addition, Dr. Soffer presented his findings at the annual conference of the Hydroponic Society of America in 1988.
Except for the papers mentioned above, very little has been printed up to now on the aerohydroponic method. The method was patented internationally, though few licenses for the production of equipment have been granted. Without aggressive commercial support, the aero-hydroponic method has remained largely a research tool, known mostly to university researchers.In the meantime, the rockwool method was becoming available internationally following 12 years of exhaustive research and a strong marketing program with lots of investment in advertising, production and distribution, first in Europe and later in Japan. Following nearly a decade of rockwool use, the Dutch contacted Dr. Soffer to request permission to develop and use the aero- hydroponic method. The reason for the sudden interest of the Dutch in the aero-hydroponic method has implications for the development of
hydroponic cultivation worldwide. For rockwool cultivation to work efficiently in most commercial operations it is preferred to a use a non-recirculating nutrient solution. Nutrient solution is sent on a one-way trip through the rockwool and is then discarded. The real cost advantage of rockwool cultivation over other hydroponic methods was that the nutrient did not have to be recaptured and recirculated, reducing the system complexity of reservoirs, plumbing, pumps and pH and conductivity controllers. The once-through nutrient system also reduces the problem of nutrient solution becoming imbalanced due to erratic uptake of minerals by rapidly growing plants; plus the build up of dissolved minerals from slowly dissolving rockwool. The discharge of enormous amounts of spent nutrient solution has become a major problem in Holland, contaminating surface and ground waters. Consequently, the Dutch government has prohibited the dumping of nutrients resulting in renewed interest in recirculating systems such as aero-hydroponics. As leaders in both horticulture and commercial hydroponics, the Dutch have recognized the value of a method, which enables rapid and trouble-free cultivation and eliminates the problems of disposing of spent nutrients and exhausted media.


The Aero-hydroponic Method
Aero-hydroponics is not a simple method to understand. The equipment required is somewhat more complicated than other hydroponic methods, but there is a great advantage in that once an aero-hydroponic system is set up, it will run almost indefinitely without additional investment in such disposable components as growing media and non-recalculating nutrients. What is most surprising about aero-hydroponics is not how it works, but why plants grow better. The key is dissolved oxygen at the root boundary zone. The essence of Dr. Soffer's work at UCD was in quantifying root growth in proportion to dissolved oxygen. Only the green parts of the plant can form oxygen from carbon dioxide roots require a supply of oxygen for metabolism and growth. Plant growth in oxygen deficient conditions, such as those found in many soils, is limited. Dr. Soffer found the enhanced oxygen at the root zone produced enhanced growth. In aero-hydroponics, the nutrient solution is sprayed through the air in order to infuse the nutrient with dissolved oxygen. The method differs from classic aeroponics in that most of the
plant's roots are not suspended in air and fed by a spray of nutrient solution; rather, the majority of the roots are submerged in oxygen-infused nutrient which is in constant motion in order t maintain high levels of dissolved oxygen at the root boundary zone where oxygen and nutrients are taken in by the plant. The result is a propagating tool of unsurpassed performance. Dr. Soffer was successful in propagating plant varieties at UCD that had never been propagated before. He took particular delight in propagating varieties of conifers and even pistachio trees (pistachio cuttings required 90 days to generate roots). Moreover, he found that cuttings could be rooted aerohydroponically in purified water without using rooting hormones such as IBA or NAA. This is because plant tissue already contains the natural rooting hormone IAA (Indole Acetic Acid). Aero-hydroponic Systems. Aero-hydroponic systems can be built using quite a variety of materials and in numerous design configurations. The Ein Gedi "Mini Unit" which was used at UCD for dissolved oxygen studies is a stand-alone module which supports four plants in 10 liters of nutrient solution. An electric motor mounted on the top of the unit spins a nutrient sprayer, which lifts nutrient solution and sprays it onto the "aerial roots." Additionally, the rotation causes the nutrient within the unit to stir, moving it constantly over the submerged roots. Large-scale aero-hydroponic systems follow the design of the commercial installation at Ein Gedi. These commercial systems consist of "canals" or growing chambers with plant sites on top. A pump provides the pressure to drive a system of sprayers to supply the aerial roots, while the submerged roots hang into the flowing nutrient in the canal. Both of these systems share fundamental characteristics, which define the aero-hydroponic method. The plants are supported above the flowing nutrient. The roots hang down through an air gap in which nutrient is sprayed, then into the moving nutrient solution below the air gap. The nutrient sprayed through the air gap is not so much intended to feed the plant, but rather to infuse oxygen into the nutrient solution wherein the feeder roots remain constantly submerged. It is these submerged roots in oxygen rich nutrient that provides most of the
nutrition and oxygen for the plant.


Home Installation
The AeroFlo system is designed and built by General Hydroponics following the Aerohydroponic
method. It consists of a reservoir placed below the growing chambers, which support the plants. The nutrient in this system is changed every two weeks and the pH is
adjusted to 5.5 to 6.5 and nutrient conductivity is maintained at about 800 to 1200 ppm. Since there is no growing medium except a handful of "GROROX" at each plant site, pH remains very stable and only requires an initial adjustment when mixing fresh nutrient, if the
water supply is of good quality.


The AERO-HYDROPONIC METHOD is without doubt the most advanced hydroponic method that has been developed to date. The cost of constructing and installing systems, plus the complications of obtaining licensing, have been deterrents to widespread commercial
application. This is changing as commercial growers, researchers, serious hydroponic gardeners and manufacturers become aware of the capabilities and value of aero-hydroponics. Lawrence L. Brooke is the owner and founder of General Hydroponics in Sebastopol, California
Originally published in The Growing Edge, Vol 2, No 1, Fall 1990

The debate on "Organics" and "Hydroponics"
There is a huge popular debate about the value of "organic"
fertilizers and methods, many people would like to apply
"organics" to hydroponics. Currently accepted organic fertilizer
components are dependent upon organisms in the soil to convert
the "organic" materials into a useable form for plants.
In hydroponics we provide the minerals required for plant growth
directly, completely eliminating the need for soil and soilorganisms.
The result is much higher growth rates, yields and even
crop quality than organic methods can achieve. This is not what
some people want to hear, but it is the simple scientific truth - and
practically all scientists and educators in the fields of agriculture
and chemistry know it and will be the first to agree. In fact, the
kinds of materials which are permitted for use under "organic"
regulations are not of sufficient purity to be used for hydroponic
culture.


With this in mind it's important to recognize the reasons that
"organically" grown produce is gaining such popularity.
Consumers want to buy produce which is not tainted with
hazardous chemicals or poisons. There is an increasing public
demand for methods which are gentle on our delicate planet and
which don't harm the soil, water or ecosystems. Hydroponic
farming methods fit properly into this system of values if used
appropriately. Hydroponics protects soil because it doesn't use soil.
Less water is required for hydroponic culture and consequently
more food can be cultivated with less water. The fertilizers we use
for hydroponics are ultra-pure and leave no residue in the
cultivated fruits and vegetables. Since hydroponic technologies are
more efficient than soil methods, more people can be fed with less
area and ecological impact.


THE ORGANIC HYDROPONIC DEBATE OPENING
PANDORA'S BOX
As seen in the Growing Edge Magazine
During the 1980’s, Americans increasingly became more health conscious. Cholesterol was ruled out and exercise became a part of
our daily routines. Today this still holds true, but even more so.
What we put into our bodies is carefully scrutinized, even our
fruits and vegetables, which has made “organic” a buzzword of the
‘90s. People are buying organic skin care products, “organic
shampoos” and even "organic clothing”. Everybody seems to want
“organic” and hydroponic growers are quite aware of this. Why,
then, are there hardly any "Certified Organic hydroponic growers”
in the United States? Many go through a great deal of trouble to
grow their crops "organically," but even though they follow most
guidelines, they still cannot get the recognition or certification
necessary to sell their produce to most restaurants or natural food
stores as “organic”. What is it that is separating organic from
hydroponic methods? Why can't these two technologies work
together under today's American states' certification guidelines?
WHAT'S ORGANIC, WHAT'S NOT?
We would think that this is an easy question to answer, but it isn't.
In the United States there are numerous different definitions of
"organic", many of which differ significantly. Each state has its
own regulations for labeling produce as “organic". Additionally,
there are 36 non-governmental organizations which can certify"
produce as organic. For example, California growers who wish to
sell their produce as "organic" must register with the California
Department of Food and Agriculture and pass their inspection.
However, California grower's can also obtain certification through
the California Certified Organic Farmers (CCOF), which actually
has higher standards for organic than the state has.
The CCOF certification is optional, but produce with California
state registration and CCOF certification may be offered for sale
within the state as "certified organic" If the grower chooses not to
seek CCOF certification, the produce can be offered for sale in
California as "organic," but not "certified organic”. Any produce
grown outside of the United States can be sold as "certified
organic" in the country if one of the 36 non-governmental
organizations certifies it. In fact, produce from any state can be
granted certification from one of the non-governmental
organizations, even if it does not meet the organic standards for the
state in which it is being sold. Pretty confusing!
What this all means is that the "organic" label is a matter of
bureaucratic definitions, which can vary from state to state, and
country to country.


In order to bring some kind of standard into play, the U.S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA) – along with state government
regulators, non-governmental certifiers, consumers, industry
interest groups, food processors and various special interest groups
– is writing a federally mandated set of "organic" standards. No
state will be able to apply more stringent standards than those of
the federal. Sometime this spring, the federal standards will be
released for a 90 day comment and review period, and by the end
of 1996 or early 1997, these standards will become law, or
"Frankenlaw"; we'll have to wait and see.
The basic objectives of "organic" practice include the following:
• Avoidance of pesticides, by use of natural pest controls (also
applied by many hydroponics growers).
• Caring for soil by recording nutrients and composting, and
• Moderation of nutrient application with reliance on the buffer
action of humus derived from compost.
Soilless hydroponic cultivation moderates nutrient supply by the
more exact measurements of soluble nutrient formulations, mixed
to meet the optimum requirements of each plant species and
growth phase. Many consumers select "organic" produce,
believing that this is the only way to be assured of pesticide-free
non—hazardous food. While "organic" farming methods do
produce crops generally superior to and safer than those grown by
agri-business practices, modern hydroponic techniques can put
forth equally safe food that in many cases offers advances in
nutrition and taste over their soil-grown “organic” counterparts.
But to the consumer, it's the label that counts, so an increasing
number of growers throughout the United States are struggling to
get organic certification in any way, shape or form.
Meanwhile, this whole situation poses an enormous dilemma to
hydroponic growers who also want organic recognition for their
produce. The primary problem for organic hydroponic growers is
in the formulation of the soilless nutrient solution. A secondary
issue, which concerns the federal regulators, is in the way used
hydroponic nutrient and media such as rockwool are disposed of.
Since "organic" is to a large extent a farming philosophy in support
of a healthy environment, the federal concern is entirely
reasonable.


Although the latter factor has no bearing on the quality and safety
of the produce itself, the impact upon the planet is a real driving
force behind the issue of "organic" farming. If hydroponic growers
can find a way to completely recycle exhausted water, nutrients
and media, then the argument in favor of "organic-hydroponic
certification" becomes much stronger, but there's still the issue of
formulating a satisfactory organic hydroponic nutrient mix.
Organic nutrient regulations prohibit the use of many mineral salts
and highly refined substances, including food and pharmaceutical
grade ingredients that are extremely important for successful
hydroponic nutrient formulation.


Only unrefined minerals can be used on "organic" crops and these
often don't dissolve well or contain quantities of impurities, some
of which are even relatively toxic but are "natural” and therefore
“okay”, according to organic standards. For example, mined
phosphate may contain excessive amounts of fluoride, good for
teeth in very small quantities, but harmful to humans in excess.
Mined phosphate also can contain small amounts of radioactive
elements such as radium, which releases radon, also not good for
human health. Chlorides, too, are permitted for organic cultivation
but though they are naturally mined, they can be bad for both
plants and soil, especially if used in excess. Some soils used by
organic farmers contain such toxic elements as selenium, which
can accumulate in the plant tissues and produce. Amazing, isn't it?
When refined, any impurities or toxicities such as those listed
above are removed, but refined minerals make for non-organic
produce. Blood meal, bone meal, fish meal and manures pose
almost no potential safety hazards, but they don't dissolve very
well; they must be broken down through microbial action in the
soil and therefore don't work well in hydroponic applications.
There is also a problem that sometimes arises when using manures.
The Western Fertilizer Handbook, an important guide for
American farmers, points out that many gastro-intestinal illnesses
can he traced back to manures used on organically gown crops. In
the summer of 1995, a serious outbreak of salmonella poisoning
resulted from an organic cantaloupe crop growing in soil fertilized
with fresh chicken manure. The rinds of the melons had become
contaminated and the bacteria caused serious intestinal illness for
many consumers.


Another point that can be made is that strict vegetarians or animal
rights activists may be offended by the use of blood, bone, horn,
hoof and feather meals to grow their food, but these are primary
nutrient sources for organic farmers.
As you can see, this issue Is very complex and there are many
points of view. Essentially though, "organic" farming is part
philosophy and part methodology, but unfortunately defined
bureaucratically.


WHAT'S HYDROPONIC; WHAT'S NOT?
If a plant is grown without soil and with a complete nutrient
solution, that's hydroponics! It can be as simple as plants glowing
in sand, gravel or rockwool with a nutrient drip, or as complex as a
complete waterculture system, such as NFT (Nutrient Film
Technique) or aeroponics.


No matter what method you use, the key to successful
hydroponics is nutrients. Hydroponic crops are raised on a
perfected mix of primary, secondary and micro-nutrients. The
formulas for different crops and environments vary, but all have
been defined from extensive experience with a wide variety of
crops growing in many different environments throughout the
world. Problems may occur where water quality is poor and where
environmental extremes of high or low temperature and humidities
place stress on crops; however, when a hydroponic facility is
properly planned and installed, the resulting crops can be
impressive. Data generated in Europe, Israel, Canada, Australia
and the United States have defined precise combinations of
minerals for a variety of crops. The data is so accurate that

Courtesy of General Hydroponics


 

Interior Gardens

1620 Central Avenue NE
Suite #115
Minneapolis, MN 55413

Order Line: 1-800- 498-4178

Office: 1-612-870-9077

Fax: 1-612-870-8901

 

order@interiorgardens.com